Welcome!
Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversations Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study?
As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).
Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!
--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100
As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).
Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!
--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100
Monday, October 25, 2010
Is Google making us stupid?
Is Google making us stupid? That is the title and main object of debate in the essay that Nicholas Carr wrote. While not staying on one side of the fence and voicing his opinions Carr would prefer to sit on it and throw the pros and cons back and forth. Carr mentions early on in this essay that his mind is changing, the way he thinks is changing. He states that his concentration would drift when trying to read a lengthy piece of writing, that he would lose focus after only a few pages of what he used to read for hours. “I feel as if I’m always dragging my wayward brain back to the text. The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle.” He later indicates that he is spending a lot of time online, the internet is a godsend to him as a writer, and that Google helps him find a quick fact or quote. The Internet is changing society itself, not just the way we read or find information, but how we are able to purchase things, contribute our thoughts, opinions, and feelings. He connects his activity on the internet to his change in reading. Later on in his essay Carr uses Maryanne Wolf, a developmental psychologist at Tufts University. She claims that “We are not only what we read, we are how we read.” She also makes another statement that gave me a good shock and a look into how the mind works. As stated in his essay “Reading, explains Wolf, is not an instinctive skill for human beings. It’s not etched into our genes the way speech is. We have to teach our minds to translate the symbolic characters we see into the language we understand.” So, in other words, reading and writing is something that can change easily and frequently. While Google may not be making us stupid it is making us efficient in finding facts that we need quickly.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment