Welcome!

Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversations Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study?

As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).

Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!

--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100



Wednesday, October 13, 2010

"A Vision of Students Today" Response

The opening credits begin with a quote by Marshall McLuhan in 1967, “Today’s child is bewildered when he enters the 19th century environment that still characterizes the educational establishment where information is scarce but ordered and structured by fragmented, classified patterns subjects, and schedules,” that starts the tone, while walking into an empty classroom. The high keys from the piano play in the background, which soon follows a consistent repetitive beat. The music helps to set the mood, drawing the viewers in. Ideas are expressed by handwritten notes on the walls, desks, and chalkboard. “Of course walls and desks cannot talk.” “But students can.” Students fill the room, each with their own voice to share. Their voices are shared and heard through technology. The question “What is it like being a student today?” is posted. Within seconds, the students are communicating their thoughts onto one interconnected document, allowing everyone to share their thoughts in a fast technological realm. Each of the students engaged in the topic. The students begin to confess their reality of what being a student is like, handwriting their confessions on notebook paper raising it for others to see. Reality sinks in. Technology seems to take up a large percentage of the students’ lives (TV, Facebook, using cell phones, general time online, etc.). One student spoke of how she will read 8 books this year, compared to 2300 web pages, and 1281 Facebook profiles.

The students speak of how their lives are affected by technology, the reality of old style schooling, and how this will affect their future. A student wrote, “I complete 49% of the readings assigned to me.” Then the same student held up a paper that said, “Only 26% are relevant to my live.” The old style way of learning isn’t engaging the students, not nearly as much as technology can. Learning the old style way can’t always be relevant to the students’ lives. This causes fewer students to care, and therefore fewer who succeed in the classroom and beyond.

Money and time are being wasted. The students continue to share how much time they spend doing certain activities in a day. By their calculations, they have 26.5 hours a day dedicated to the various daily activities they listed, such as being online, sleeping, eating, studying, etc. Roughly 8.5 of those hours are spent using or engaging with technology. A student shares, “I am a multi-tasker, I have to be.” With all these activities going on, there is no time to fit it all into one day, proven by the activities that calculate to more than a full day.

Yet another student lifts up an SAT answer sheet saying, “Filling this out won’t help me get there.” This speaks towards getting a job. The whole classroom goes on to say further that filling the SAT answer sheet out won’t help with “war,” “poverty,” “pollution,” “hunger,” and many other real world issues. This is reasoning for making the learning relevant, learning for a purpose; a purpose that goes beyond just getting a good grade and succeeding in school. The video comes to a close by posting, “Some have suggested that technology can save us…Some have suggested that technology alone can save us.” The chalkboard is shown yet again, as the teacher writes what the chalkboard can’t provide, photos, videos, animations, and network. Technology offers all of these methods of learning.

I feel the message behind this video is to awaken the ideals behind conventional learning, and prove technology can be used as a tool to stay relevant, to stay connected, and engage with the topic being discussed. By using technology, our minds will expand and we will be able to reach a level of reality where we can put our knowledge to good use. What we will learn will be applied to our own lives by engaging with technology.

No comments:

Post a Comment