Welcome!

Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversations Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study?

As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).

Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!

--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100



Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Clive Thompson on "The New Literacy"

“Facebook encourages narcissistic blabbering.” That is one of the very first lines in the essay “The New Literacy” by Clive Thompson. In this essay there is a another writer named Andrea Lunsford who is a professor at Stanford University and has some different outlooks on technology and how literacy is affected by all these new technologies, as well as how we as learners and citizens write now days.

Lunsford states, “I think we are in the midst of a literacy revolution the likes of which we haven’t seen since Greek civilization.” (par 3) I think she is completely right, most of the writing we do now is far different then what people used to do. People don’t write letters anymore, we simply write emails that are far more efficient. Lunsford and Thompson do not agree about this subject. Thompson’s theory is that kids these days are incapable of writing and that technology is behind the problem. But on the other hand, Lunsford has a point that is almost unarguable.

When Lunsford studied how we write these days, she found some really good points. She found that young people today are writing far more than any generation before. That is because of technology, she says that in the old days people may never write a paragraph again after they are done with school because their jobs don’t require it and there is no other reason too. Now we have 6 year olds online talking to their friends and constructing whole paragraphs. She goes along to say, “The fact that students today almost always write for an audience (something virtually no one in my generation did) gives them a different sense of what constitutes as good writing.” (par 7).

Im not saying that Lunsford is against teaching and that all we need is internet to teach kids how to write properly, because that is definitely not true. There is a lot of “Slang” you could call it on the internet. There are many cases where you see even adults saying things like “Where u at?” or “U R 2????”. It is actually a little bit ridiculous. Lunsford states, “Of course, good teaching is always going to be crucial, as is the mastering of formal academic prose. But its also becoming clear that online media is pushing literacy into cool directions.” (Par 8). Such as texting or status updates where we can share our ideas and thoughts with the world. No other generation has had such power.
Overall, I fully agree with Lunsford in that we should use technology to our good. There can be bad things along with internet, but if used properly with old school teaching, technology can teach us great things.

3 comments:

  1. Its a very good blog post, it helped me understand his opinions on the topic!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your introduction is really good, it was creative of you to use a quote to start off your writing

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like how you point out that there is "slang' on the internet that is often rediculous and when you said that if you mix old school methods with the practical use of it today, it can encourage our learning.

    ReplyDelete