Welcome!

Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversations Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study?

As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).

Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!

--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100



Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Clive Thompson "A look inside his thoughts"

Clive Thompson’s Article “ The New Literacy” explains certain view’s and opinions people hold about technology and literacy of our nation. A lot of the article if you read explains university professors views and understanding that technology is taking over. But some disagree with each other when saying that are literacy is becoming demised because of it. Thompson claims, “that students today almost always write for an audience.” He is right. No matter if it’s a girl your trying to impress a homework assignment or maybe writing an essay for your English class it is always audience oriented. Is it cause the reader’s thoughts matter to us? Yes and no. My own view is that most of the time our thoughts are expressed is because of ignorance. Though I concede that what they are saying is were writing for an audience. I still maintain guilty conscience. For example, expressions are used when a person can no longer keep inside so the person seeks help and even go to the point were they use it as a stress relief. Although so might disagree. I reply that if not for are own stress relief than the audience’s. The issue is important becomes of the emphasis on this subject. While reading this article it become apparent to me that technology does help us in a way to exercise free speech. Whether its texting your friend late at night, posting your latest happening’s on facebook or proving information to people about your product if you will. It’s all related to your views. Clive talks about this on his last paragraph “Of course, good teaching is always going to be crucial, as is the mastering of formal academic prose. But it's also becoming clear that online media are pushing literacy into cool directions. The brevity of texting and status updating teaches young people to deploy haiku-like concision. At the same time, the proliferation of new forms of online pop-cultural exegesis—from sprawling TV-show recaps to 15,000-word videogame walkthroughs—has given them a chance to write enormously long and complex pieces of prose, often while working collaboratively with others.” What i can grab from this is that our nation is improving and experimenting with new toys. Constantly testing how literacy is applied and making up there own language as we go. He makes a good point that “pop exegesis” is becoming are major attention and I couldn’t agree more. We seek this information because its beneficial to us as the reader providing answers to the question one might ask while online. Which pop’s the question? Is literacy evolving or diminishing? Most teachers would agree that they enjoy the writing the old fashion way but would also admit they text and email on there cell phone’s. When think about this what is the point of writing formal? Is it To make the content look professional? Or is it strictly tradition aging back to the Greeks? All and all literacy is changing, but will the new way strike a revolution? These are the questions that need answering.

No comments:

Post a Comment