Welcome!
Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversations Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study?
As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).
Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!
--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100
As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).
Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!
--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100
Monday, November 15, 2010
Deshpande Summary
Writer Shekhar Deshpande recently wrote an article by the name of "The Confident Gaze". This writing talks about the different magazines and how the images in those such as the National Geographics are influencing the readers and their education on the culture it is portraying. An image is shown as an example, the image is of a small boy painted the color red, he he ethnic and looks impovreshed and poor, his facial expression shows unhappiness and dispare. While this cover may sound upsetting, the photographer makes the picture so that it meets the viewers eye in satisfaction. Dishpande states "but while it covers or represents such issues or situations, it can sanitize and even beautifuy the blood and the gore of the conflic. This power to transform the most repulsive results of human actions around the world into images that are digestible is what makes for the culture of National Geographic" (Par 11). This is saying that even the most grusome and horrific pictures of them all could be portrayed on a magazine but the edditors and photographers are never showing what it truely is, they always have to set it up and get each detail perfectly shown as beautiful as they can make it; this is what makes a successful magizene. Most viewers and readers of these magizene's are not looking close to detail, they glance at an image and quickly read through the text, but is what they are looking at what is really being shown? Deshpande does not think so and nither do I. I believe that these people are being tricked into lies of a certian culture and because of it, it makes a magizene sell. Deshpande mentions "the 'innocent' attractiveness of the photography of National Geographic, its ambiguous representtation of the knower and the known as the most 'natural' and inevitable parts of our world are what have made for the success of the magazine" (Par 7). This is the part where he writes about how these images that are portraying fake culture are being sold because of their beauty and ability to capture parts of the image that would not be seen if seen in person. I think that the claim that concludes it all up is when he says "human suffering becomes worth a good image" (Par 10).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment