Welcome!
Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversations Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study?
As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).
Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!
--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100
As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).
Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!
--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100
Monday, November 15, 2010
Deshpande Summary
In the article, "The Confident Gaze" written by Shekhar Deshpande, he claims that National Geographic magazine "is quite sensitive to trouble spots and trouble contexts; it does not pretend to evade such situations. But while it covers or represents such issues or situations, it can sanitize and even the blood and gore of conflict." This very much describes how the images that you see in the magazine are posed and set up to be aesthetically pleasing to the eyes of the Western culture. Shekhar says, "It is as if the world needs to be posed in the appropriate way to the Western observer, he could not see bare essentials." Western civilization likes to think that anyone not living up to "their" standards or with the same lifestyles and technology as them, are below them and somehow their lives are not rich and fulfilling. Because of this, National Geographic magazine caters towards the needs of the Western observer and shows life in "third world" countries as poverty stricken and in need. Western observers are, in a sick way, entertained by this idea. The photographs are set up to make the people appear "lesser than" rather than their true life situations. Shekhar also states, "the photographs are rich in their content, but entirely dishonest in their relationship to the environment or the context." It sad how the truth comes out about such an amazing magazine that has won photography awards. We are introduced to National Geographic in elementary school to expose us to other countries and situations around the world. It is unfortunate that we were not told that the photos were set up therefore we grow up assuming that every country is "lower" than us and poverty stricken.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment