Welcome!

Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversations Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study?

As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).

Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!

--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100



Thursday, November 11, 2010

Deshpande's View on National Geographic

Shekhar Deshpande creates an article most interesting, mind boggling and crucial for mankind to think about. “The confident gaze,” named by the author to suggest ideas about what National Geographic may be sending mixed messages to the American people. He shares pictures, stories, and claims many things about hunger, suffering, and photography. His details can make you wonder, whether your on his side of the story or the other end of the spectrum.

Shekhar Deshpande claims, “they are great in providing excruciating details of misery, the unpreparedness of a youngster in the rain or the paucity of food and water on the pavement.” Deshpande suggests that the magazine of National Geographic creates as many pictures as they can of misery, sadness and poverty. The photographers would capture a picture of this boy that is suffering in the wet, cold rain rather than a bright sunny day. The photographers of National Geographic loves to capture the essence of hunger and loss.

National Geographic shows poverty because that is what India is mostly made of. There aren’t as many rich and flourishing places in India as the Western Hemisphere. America provides hotel, rich cities, and consumerism. India gives rich culture, religion, history, and hospitality. The great county of India includes one billion people in which the poverty level is high and more people are living in the size of an American bedroom as their house.

Deshpande states, “human suffering becomes worth a good image.” Shekhar Deshpande conveys to the American public that the life of human that suffers and is in great pain provides a beautiful and glorious picture in the magazine of National Geographic.

Suffering captures the curiosity, wonder, and phenomenon of the eye of the beholder. In magazine, ads and the internet whether it is the misery of a human or a dog, it still catches your attention because you see the sorrow. If you saw happiness and joy, instinctively you would skip over it because the people are having more fun or in a better situation than you are. Yet at times happy people make you just want to smile! So the big question is,” do photographers capture suffering on purpose?”

No comments:

Post a Comment