Welcome!

Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversations Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study?

As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).

Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!

--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100



Monday, November 15, 2010

Deshpande!

In the article "The Confident Gaze" written by Shekhar Deshpande analyzes promotional tactics used by National Geographic magazine, mainly focusing on their new magazine celebrating 50 years of India. Deshpande claims in his article that National Geographic "is quite sensitive to trouble spots and trouble contexts; it does not pretend to evade such situations. But while it covers or represents such issues or situations, it can sanitize and even the blood and gore of conflict"(2). In essence Deshpande is saying that National Geographic does not avoid suffering, but makes it disassociates it from its reader, keeping the reader in their comfort zone. Deshpande goes on to make a similar, bolder claim, saying “This power to transform the most repulsive results of human actions around the world into images that are digestible is what makes for the culture of National Geographic.”(2) This is an extremely bold claim, Deshpande is directly accusing National Geographic of exploiting human suffering in a way so that Westerners can “enjoy” these photos, but not feel connected with the problems being presented. Deshpande’s ends his article by questioning whether India actually has catching up to do, as the National Geographic article implied, saying “but it has a lot of catching up to do if “catching up” has to mean something”. By this, Deshpande was saying that Westerners may believe that India needs to “catch up”, but India may not want to “catch up” to Western society, they may want to live differently, in the way they always have.

No comments:

Post a Comment